“My Family Would Crucify me personally!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage

“My Family Would Crucify me personally!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage


The current research examined the recognized influence of parental and social force on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and relationships that are cross-cultural? (2) Just how can the individuals feel it impacts upon them? And finally, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they will react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that most the individuals were affected by the social stress placed upon them. More over, the individuals observed the previous generation as “racist”. But, interestingly there are signs and symptoms of an attitude shift that is generational. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 per cent for the individuals would not would you like to interfere within their children’s partner selection. The rest of the 20 per cent had been against interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages.

This might be a preview of membership content, access via your organization.

Access choices

Purchase solitary article

Access immediately into the full article PDF.

Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.

Donate to journal

Immediate on the web access to all or any presssing issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.


It must be noted that relationship is generally speaking perhaps not appropriate within the Arab and community that is muslim others) unless the couple’s intention is always to date exclusively (nonetheless, specific limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) along with the seek to get hitched. Furthermore, in some instances, the approval associated with female’s daddy ( or other significant male figure) is had a need to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed through the assortment of the info so that you can respect individuals’ social traditions and spiritual observing.


Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial relationship: Uncertainty, understanding, therefore the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social therapy (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test for the contact hypothesis among bulk and minority teams in three countries in europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.

Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin males dating Jewish ladies. nana10. Retrieved 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227 december.

Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing identities that are mixed the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing information that is qualitative Thematic analysis and rule development. Ny, NY: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim adults: The part of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous kinds of tradition. US Psychologist, 64, 194–204.

Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex therefore the context that is cultural of and closeness. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.

Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence system participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.

Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Sign, 26, 415–440.

Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.

Felmlee, D. (2003). Conversation in internet sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 389–409). Ny: Plenum.

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking attributes with all the passing of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.

Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of battle for starting a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.

Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the collection of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Reasons, patterns, styles. Yearly Review of Sociology, 395–421.

Lasson, K https://besthookupwebsites.org/girlsdateforfree-review/. (2008). Bloodstains for a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of females in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.

Lewis, R. (1973). Social effect and also the development of dyads: an approach that is interactionist mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.

Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to develop and implementation. London: Wiley.

Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a tiny university campus. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence systems and also the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites and also the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Communication Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.

Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults that are young. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social support systems on intimate relationships: Through the lens of this network that is social. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.

Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative perspective. Sociology, 35(1), 129.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and ways of qualitative meeting studies. Ny: The Complimentary Press.

Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort advertising training. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. Marriage and Family Review.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not totally all love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in an area that is conflict-ridden. Center East Journal.